Previous Event Roundup: Naz Shah MP in Conversation

Posted on Updated on

DSC02455xNaz Shah MP returned to The University of Bradford to talk about the infamous Bradford West Campaign, her first 80 days in Parliament and her priorities for the next 5 years and beyond. Expertly probed by Dr Parveen Akhtar, Sociology lecturer at the university, Naz Shah gave real insight into how her battle with George Galloway affected her personally, how she is growing as a politician & a person and how she intends to make Bradford the tech capital of the North.

The Campaign

Most of what people know about Naz Shah came during the tempestuous Bradford West where she took on and defeated infamous incumbent George Galloway. For those keeping the most cursory of eyes on the campaign will have witnessed behaviour unbecoming of any politician in the civilized world. It was fitting, then, that Naz Shah opened up about how she was affected by the “revelations” posted on social media and handed around Bradford West’s Asian communities. Her blog post, which went viral and was picked up across the main stream media, was penned almost immediately after her selection as the candidate for Bradford West… and was in direct response to the waves of attacks she expected. “Within two hours of being selected,” she told us, “two fake Twitter accounts in my name had sprung up” as well as doctored photos. If not going so far as to make a direct link between the accounts and her adversary  George Galloway, she noted that they belonged to his supporters, and chose to reveal her story as “I’ll be damned if a rape apologist is going to control my narrative!” She also revealed that late in the campaign, a handwritten letter was passed around Bradford West Asian communities which accused Shah of being “a working girl” and, to her great distress, questioned the paternity of her children. Obviously upset, Shah spoke passionately and defiantly about the experience, saying that she was tough enough to take the accusations about her, but that bringing her children into the campaign was beyond the pale.

Shah also voiced her disappointment at the lack of local support, particularly from women’s groups. She enjoyed vocal support from national groups, such as Southall Black Sisters, but found it lacking in Bradford, and felt that, in particular, some Muslim women’s groups and powerful Muslim women within the city could have done more given who she was and who she was fighting.

Given all those faceless, nameless voices who were against her, she took time to thank the people of Bradford and beyond – of every political party and none – who gave her support in the face of such antagonism: “For every troll, I had a hundred fantastic people.”

The attacks also reminded her of why she moved from community activist to politician – although those are monikers she’s uncomfortable in swapping. She told us how Khalid Mahmood MP (Birmingham Perry Barr) came to Bradford to discover local talent. It was him asking Shah why, when she had the bottle to battle Galloway and an understanding of what she thought needed to happen in Bradford to improve things, she wouldn’t throw her hat in the ring. “It’s a dirty game and it’s a man’s world” she told him; but it was his challenge – if you don’t stand, how will you change things? – that first made her seriously contemplate running.

DSC02450xPriorities – Technology

Naz Shah laid out her priorities fpr her time in parliament, starting with her desire to bring tech money, jobs and prospects into the city. Noting that Bradford will be the UK’s youngest city by 2020, she wants the city to use this to its advantage by bringing in investment and for Bradford to become the Northern Powerhouse’s tech capital. Although low on specifics of who and how she’s courting, she is clear that Bradford’s best chance of success is to become a leading edge in the technological revolution, much as its previous wealth came from leading the industrial revolution. She has met with two of Labour’s possible leaders, Yvette Cooper and Andy Burnham, about what their leadership would bring to Bradford and both threw their weight behind Shah’s Bradford Taskforce which has technology at its heart.

Priorities – Education

Leading in the field of technology cannot come without changes to educational attainment for our young people. Education cropped up again and again during the campaign, and with Bradford languishing as the worst city in England for educational attainment and pitifully low in terms of the number of Good schools, education is key to any future prosperity.

Shah has met with Dave Green, leader of Bradford Council, and Susan Hinchcliffe, portfolio holder for schools, to discuss plans. She referred to the plans already in progress and the input from Professor David Woods who worked on London Challenge which transformed schools & schooling in the capital. She assured us that she will be working closely with the council and making sure that they are doing what they say they will and that it is having an effect – and would welcome a further visit from Ofsted which, she is sure, will back her belief that change is happening. Whilst she lamented the way the council has dealt with change for decades, she is confident that her City Hall colleagues are on the right track.

Priorities – Breaking Down Barriers

No discussion with any of Bradford District’s five MPs could take place without race being mentioned. Naz Shah stated categorically that she is MP for everyone in Bradford West irrespective of race – and noted that, often, discussing race is unhelpful because, in Bradford, it is class and income which are far better determiners of employment, education, skills and income than simply the colour of your skin. This is the battle she wants to fight.

In discussing race, she spoke of the frequent accusation that Muslims don’t integrate and that monoracial areas are of Muslim’s causing. Admitting that getting communities working together is a tough challenge and one where successive parliamentarians have struggled to make a difference, she knows she must act fast and hard to make a difference.

Several anecdotes demonstrated that she is acutely aware of the problems she faces: from the white couple moving out when she moved, the Asian family who sent round introductory cards but received only one in return, to the family in Toller ward who were shocked when she came knocking as they’d never had a politician call on them before because (they believed) they were white.

Labour – Leadership & Loss

Naz Shah spoke passionately about why Labour lost the election: in her view, a lack of honesty caused Labour’s downfall. She believes that Labour needs to reconnect with people and be seen again as the party of the working man. “We didn’t own our own narrative” and the scaremongering about links to the SNP, not getting away from being blamed for the global financial crash and being seen as the party for the unemployed not the working man all contributed to the defeat.

She was clear about the direction the party should take and is still undecided about who should lead it. Although she originally got behind Yvette Cooper, she is equally enamoured of Andy Burnham. For her, deciding who to throw her weight behind was difficult because there is “a Rizzla paper between them” and either could lead the party. Keeping her options open, she has not publically backed or campaigned for either (excepting appearing at one hustings for Yvette Cooper).

On Jeremy Corbyn, the most left, least Blairite candidate, she was less supportive but not dismissive, noting that she hadn’t met with those in his camp (which includes Bradford East’s Imran Hussain) as, at the time, his candidature was not a serious prospect like it is now.

The Welfare Bill

Labour has come under attack for its interim leadership calling for an abstention, and Shah has faced this criticism. In her defence, she was categorical: she did not abstain – but voted for the amendment. She did not vote against the government’s bill, though, as many Labour rebels did, including Bradford East’s Imran Hussain. Her explanation as to why revolved around Labour’s problems noted earlier and how it is struggling to lead and engage. Her view, and that of the party’s leadership, is that a vote against the bill would have been tagged as a vote against opportunity as the bill contained provision for 3 million new apprenticeships. Branding the bill’s make up as “Tory trap”, she felt unable to vote against it as it would further entrench belief that Labour is the party of the unemployed not the working man. She will oppose the bill, though, and noted that this battle is not over – the real work to ensure that educational maintenance grants, caps on the number of children who receive child benefit and more will come in committee and debate, not on the passing of one vote.

The Vote

We always have a vote at Politics in the Pub – and not being ones to pull punches, we put in a particularly contentious one: Are you confident Naz Shah will be a good representative of Bradford West? It’s difficult to put your hand up against someone when they’re watching you, but we feel we’ve got a pretty honest audience and following, and the vote was split almost 50-50 between YES and DON’T KNOW with just 2 saying NO.

After answering Dr Akhtar’s questions honestly, confidently and with humility, Shah won over many in the audience. Her answer on welfare which included parliamentary process, relationships with the media and a hint of mea culpa gave many an understanding why Labour had seemed to dodge the issue and taken so much flak in the media; her desire to be everyone’s MP, not just those that either look like her, pray like her or voted for her, won her support undoubtedly; and her passion for the job which appears to have been redoubled since she shakily signed in for the first time showed us all that she is passionate about representing Bradford (whether you agree with her politics or not).

It is for these reasons that, in the end, she won over many, with around 3/4 of people saying YES they are confident she’ll represent Bradford West well and none saying NO.

DSC02462xBest of the Rest

Naz Shah was not the only Bradford West candidate speaking: James Kirkcaldy, who ran as an independent, spoke eloquently, and even in rhyme, about David Cameron’s “change in tone”, suggesting that we are witnessing a paradigm shift towards a darker, nastier side of politics where anyone, especially those of the left, can be identified as terrorists.

We also tried to get more people involved through technology and broadcasted the event using Periscope, a live streaming app which allows anyone in the world to see what you’re seeing. Although the event was well attended in person, more people tuned in via Periscope – some from Bradford, whom we’d love to see in person, but many more from across the UK, Europe and the world.

Dermot’s compere skills were again in full force and his delivery of the @CorbynJokes timeline was sublime – but the biggest laugh came for his thoughts on the Lord Sewel scandal, noting that, after being caught allegedly snorting cocaine from a prostitute’s cleavage, he should be lauded for his commitment to international trade and the local economy.

And that’s probably a good place to finish up.

Politics in the Pub would like to thank Naz and Parveen for agreeing to the event, and for being so open, honest and challenging – and also to The University of Bradford Students’ Union for being such great hosts, especially UBU’s Women’s Officer, Samayya.


2 thoughts on “Previous Event Roundup: Naz Shah MP in Conversation

    Andrew Durnion said:
    28 July 2015 at 3.58 pm

    Last week I was invited to a wedding (but only the night do!) I thought I’d go ‘smart casual’, you know, sensible jeans, casual jacket, anyway, when I arrived the venue -Blubberhouse Social Club- I was shocked to see the rest of the guests in fetish wear; nipple clamps etc.- predictive text eh? Sat Nav had lead me to ‘Rubber House Social Club.’ After laughing with a gimp I have wondered since, Naz, have you ever found yourself in the wrong party?


      jatkinson1977 responded:
      28 July 2015 at 7.41 pm

      Comments attacking people on the blog will be trashed unless eloquent and / or amusing and / or satirical.

      This one made me laugh.

      I also disagree with it. I thought Naz had a clear idea of where Labour went wrong and where she wants it to go.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s